Sep 30

Chemical Irritants Sprayed in Room With Children in Apparent Attack

Media Turns Blind Eye

By Shirien Elamawy

It’s hard to believe the Islamic holy month of Ramadan is over.

Muslims all over the world are celebrating with feasts and gatherings. But for many Muslims in America, it’s hard to celebrate in the midst of tragic news that the world has turned a blind eye to.

I implore media to let go of their bias and report on the huge news story that has been swept under the rug – despite the story having multiple elements of newsworthiness.

The incident happened in Dayton, OH when a chemical irritant was sprayed into a mosque causing worshipers to panic and children to cry from fear.

“According to fire dispatch communications, a child reported seeing two men with a white can spraying something into a window. That child was brought to the supervising firefighter at the scene,” Dayton Daily News reported.

That’s about the only thing the Dayton Daily News reported.

The Daily Kos, a political news blog which public figures like President Jimmy Carter and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi have used to voice their views, gave a much more detailed account of the incident.

A woman who witnessed the incident told The Daily Kos, “The gas was sprayed into the room where the babies and children were being kept while their mothers prayed together their Ramadan prayers. Panicked mothers ran for their babies, crying for their children so they could flee from the gas that was burning their eyes and throats and lungs.”

A paramedic at the scene tried to give oxygen to this one child who couldn’t stop crying from shock.

The woman said that her children slept with her sobbing all through the night. She was afraid to go back to the mosque.

Days earlier, the anti-Muslim, fear-mongering DVD created by Fox News, “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War on the West” had been circulating inside of newspapers and US mail in Ohio and other swing states as part of a political stunt by none other than John McCain supporters.

In fact, 28 million copies of the DVD were distributed as a scare tactic to get people to vote for John McCain, The Huffington Post reported.

“70 newspapers in swing states have been paid to distribute ‘Obsession’ this weekend and next, which means not all the DVDs have been delivered yet.”

Talk about dirty politics.

Sally Lopez of Lemoyne, PA displays a copy of the DVD that came in the mail. Photo courtesy of The Huffington Post.

And so I ask the media, where are you? If you are more interested in covering politics, this story has politics written all over it.

If you’re looking for hard news stories filled with investigations, why not investigate if there was an obvious link between the DVDs and the hate crime?

This news story is timely, has prominence, is pertinent, has conflict and has many human interest stories waiting to be told.

There is no reason why this story should remain under the rug, unless the media chooses to embrace its bias knowingly.

If this incident had happened in a church or synagogue, would the response have been different?

Children were attacked. How then, can we turn a blind eye?

Sep 19

Interesting article from today’s Associated Press:

Source: Yahoo News!
Vermont candidate to prosecute Bush if she wins

By JOHN CURRAN, Associated Press Writer Fri Sep 19, 3:45 AM ET

Lots of political candidates make campaign promises. But not like Charlotte Dennett’s.

Dennett, 61, the Progressive Party’s candidate for Vermont Attorney General, said Thursday she will prosecute President Bush for murder if she’s elected Nov. 4.

Dennett, an attorney and investigative journalist, says Bush must be held accountable for the deaths of thousands of people in Iraq — U.S. soldiers and Iraqi civilians. She believes the Vermont attorney general would have jurisdiction to do so.

She also said she would appoint a special prosecutor and already knows who that should be: former Los Angeles prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi, the author of “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder,” a new book.

“Someone has to step forward,” said Dennett, flanked by Bugliosi at a news conference announcing her plan. “Someone has to say we cannot put up with this lack of accountability any more.”

Dennett and two others are challenging incumbent Attorney General William Sorrell, a Democrat, in the Nov. 4 election.

Bugliosi, 74, who gained fame as the prosecutor of killer Charles Manson, said any state attorney general would have jurisdiction since Bush committed “overt acts” including the military’s recruitment of soldiers in Vermont and allegedly lying about the threat posed by former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in speeches that were aired in Vermont and elsewhere.

“No man, even the president of the United States, is above the law,” said Bugliosi.

The White House press office didn’t respond to a request for comment Thursday. But Republican National Committee spokesman Blair Latoff denounced Dennett.

“It’s extremely disappointing that a candidate for state attorney general is more concerned with radical left-wing provocation than upholding the law of Vermont,” Latoff said. “These incendiary suggestions may score points among the most fringe elements of American society, but can’t be settling for anyone looking for an attorney general.”

Anti-Bush sentiment runs deep in Vermont. It’s the only state Bush hasn’t visited as president, and one whose liberal tendencies make it unlikely he will.

In 2007, the state Senate adopted a resolution calling for Congress to begin impeachment proceedings against Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Last March, the towns of Brattleboro and Marlboro voted to seek indictments against Bush and Cheney over the war, and dozens of other towns voted at town meetings to call for his impeachment.

Sorrell, who is seeking a sixth term, said he doesn’t believe a Vermont attorney general would have the authority to charge Bush.

“The reality is, in my view, that unless the crime takes place in Vermont, then I as the attorney general have no authority under Vermont law to be prosecuting the president,” Sorrell said.

Sep 18

Recently, a brother commented on my recent post about “Bad Marriage Proposals.” He concluded by stating, “Girls should not be allowed to post on the internet without their Mahrams supervising them.” I went to the brother’s website to see him post this:

This basically says:

New Fatwa:
No Internet for women except with a Mahram

Riyad - Aylaf

Two Saudi Sheiookh, Uthman AlKhamees and Saad Al Ghamdy, decreed a fatwa making the Internet haram for the woman because of the “Evil Vileness of her Turned Page”. The Fatwa added that, “The woman is not allowed to open the Internet except in the presence of a mahram knowledgeable about the woman’s whoredom and wileyness”

———————————————————–

This quite frankly came as a shock to me because I’m a huge “fan” of Sheikh Uthman AlKhamees.

Now, as anyone who works in journalism would do, one would at least try to see if this was fabricated or not. After all, Uthman AlKhamees is mostly known for his debates with Shia scholars. Shia scholars always lie.

So as it turned out this is actually a FABRICATED fatwah. Because on Sheikh Uthman’s offical website was found this:

Which basically after the questioner described what he saw, he asked the sheikh if he really wrote the fatwah, to which sheikh Uthmaan replied:

“(Subhanak) this is a great slander (buhtaan), this is a lie I didn’t say, and, I haven’t come across the fatwa of Shaykh Saad al-Ghamdi”"

—————————————————————————

On top of that, this fatwah is all over the internet and is found on ( surprise, surprise) mostly Shia and Coptic websites.

Don’t believe everything you see. Brothers and sisters please verify information before you go spreading it around everywhere.

Does not Allah ‘az wa jal say in surat Al-Hujuraat:

“O you who believe! If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it, lest you harm people in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful to what you have done.”

While I do agree that there should be certain etiquette and rules to be followed, but we shouldn’t go to extremes on either end.

WAllahu alem.

Aug 8

Ohh girls, you know exactly what I’m about to talk about, don’t you? Tisk tisk.

For those of you who know what Nour is, I’m sure you already know what I’m about to talk about just by my title.

For the rest of you, get ready to be amazed at a real life example of everything that’s wrong with TV– because it’s all represented in this one Turkish soap drama, recently dubbed in Arabic, which has caused the whole Arab world to become obsessed.

It’s making its way to America too. (See Facebook groups.)

Alright, let’s first talk a little bit about Nour:

Most women who watch the show watch it because of this strikingly handsome guy, “Mohannad.” Most will also tell you they never liked the blond hair look because they all wanted the tall dark and handsome guy. Well, to them the only exception to that rule is “Mr. Mohannad.”

Anyway, apparently he marries this girl named Nour, they live amongst their huge wealthy family, babies everywhere, kidnappings, love stories, etc. etc.

I have to say I didn’t even think these people were Muslim but apparently I was told they fast Ramadan but they drink alcohol at all times of the day. Then I remembered the guy’s name was supposedly “Mohannad,” which confirmed what people have said.

In any case, the obsession of this drama has gone way too far. I don’t know anyone in Egypt or any other part of the Arab world who DOESN’T watch this show. Even people in America who have a dish are obsessed with the show.

Mufti’s in Saudi Arabia recently declared the drama to be “haram,” and rightfully so. (But isn’t almost everything else on TV?) Well, that just shows how far people have taken it. It’s gotten to a point where sheiookh have had to name it specifically and told people it’s haram to watch.

Still not convinced? Ohh just wait guys it gets better (actually horrible):

Recently, there have been reports of the divorce rate climbing in the Arab world. Why? Because of Nour fever. Women want their husbands to “be like Muhanad.”

Instead of me reporting it, go ahead and read this well written, but shocking article written by AlArabiya.net:

————-

DUBAI (AlArabiya.net)

The hit Turkish soap “Nour” which is being aired on MBC has sparked a rash of divorces in countries across the Middle East as women compare their real-life husbands to the TV heart throb, according to press reports.

The trouble centers around the lead male character called Muhannad – played by Turkish actor Kivanç Tatlitug – whose good looks and charms have left many Arab women weak at the knees.

Fed up with his wife’s obsession with Muhannad and constant complaints that he should be as romantic as the TV hunk, a Saudi husband from Dammam divorced his wife and threw her out of the marital home, Saudi newspaper Al-Yawm reported.

A Jordanian daily said a husband divorced his wife after she uploaded Muhannad’s picture on her cell phone.

And a Syrian website reported that there were four divorces in Aleppo because of the steamy soap.

In one case, a husband divorced his wife after they had a heated argument about the actor while watching the series, which MBC has dubbed into Arabic to suit Middle Eastern audiences.

According to a neighbor, the wife reportedly told her husband: “I want to sleep with Muhannad for only one night and die afterwards.”

In another case, a husband divorced his wife after she hung a picture of Muhannad – the character Mehmet in the original Turkish version – on their bedroom wall.

Nour, which airs on MBC, the parent company of Al Arabiya, is about a woman who is married to Muhannad after he loses his true love in a tragic accident.

Muhannad is then forced to marry Nour by his family. The series traces the hardships Nour must go through to win her husband’s heart and to prove herself on a professional level.

Nour, called Gümüs in the original series, is played by Turkish actress Songül Öden.

(Translated from Arabic by Sonia Farid).

————

!! I seriously can’t believe women would say and do these things. Wallahul musta’an. Seriously, this is everything that’s wrong with TV. May Allah protect us all.

Jul 24

BBC News printed this article which I find pretty interesting and shocking. Particularly the last two sentences of the article:

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7514567.stm

Egypt’s sexual harassment ‘cancer’

By Magdi Abdelhadi
BBC News, Cairo

Sexual harassment of women in Egypt is on the increase and observing Islamic dress code is no deterrent, according to a survey published this week.

The Egyptian Centre for Women’s Rights (ECWR) describes the problem as a social cancer and calls on the government to introduce legislation to curb it.

The findings contradict the widely held belief in Egypt that unveiled women are more likely to suffer harassment than veiled ones.

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN EGYPT

Experienced by 98% of foreign women visitors
Experienced by 83% of Egyptian women
62% of Egyptian men admitted harassing women
53% of Egyptian men blame women for ‘bringing it on’

Source: Egyptian Centre for Women’s Rights

Participants in the survey were shown pictures of women wearing different kinds of dress - from the mini skirt to the niqab (full face veil) and asked which were more likely to be harassed.More than 60% - including female respondents - suggested the scantily clad woman was most at risk. But in reality the study concluded the majority of the victims of harassment were modestly dressed women wearing Islamic headscarves.

ECWR head Nihad Abu El-Qoumsan said that even veiled women who were victims of harassment blamed themselves.

Western women who took part in the study demonstrated a strong belief in their entitlement to personal safety and freedom of movement, she says, but this was totally absent among Egyptian respondents.

No-one spoke about freedom of choice, freedom of movement or the right to legal protection. No-one showed any awareness that the harasser was a criminal, regardless of what clothes the victim was wearing.

Shocking attitude

The centre is campaigning for a new law that clearly defines sexual harassment as a crime and makes it easier for women to report it in Egypt - women like Noha Ostath.

The young film-maker told the BBC she was repeatedly groped in broad daylight by a van driver in a Cairo traffic jam as she walked on the pavement.

His behaviour made her so angry she ran after the van and held on to the side mirror to force the driver to stop so she could take him to a police station.

She was equally shocked by the attitude of other passers-by. Some tried to dissuade her from going to the police - others blamed her for what she was wearing (a baggy sports outfit).

In the end, after a tussle with the man that lasted for more than one hour, the strong-willed Ms Ostath dragged the man to the police station.

But even there, police officers refused to open an investigation and insisted on the presence of her father despite the fact that she is not a minor - she is 26.

Impudent allegation

After Noha’s story was published in the Badeel daily, editor-in-chief Muhammad El Sayyed Said wrote that the behaviour of the crowd was characteristic of oppressed societies, where the majority identified with the oppressor.

He blamed the increase in sexual harassment on what he said were “three decades of incitement against women” from the pulpits of some of Egypt’s mosques.

“This verbal incitement is based on the extremely sordid and impudent allegation that our women are not modestly dressed. This was, and still is, a flagrant lie, used to justify violence against women in the name of religion.”

The British foreign office says Egypt is one of the countries with the highest number of cases reported to embassy staff regarding sexual offences against visiting women.

It warns them to be extra cautious in public places especially when alone because of the risks.

Ms Abou El-Qoumsan says Egyptians need to re-evaluate their value system and school curricula and to ensure that the rule of law prevails and prevents offenders and criminals walking free because of a breakdown of basic notions of right and wrong.

Thanks to surveys like this, one encounters an endless number of newspaper articles reflecting the feeling that Egypt is in the grip of a moral crisis.

Perhaps nothing illustrates Egypt’s loss of a moral compass than the responses of some men in the ECWR study.

Some said they harassed a woman simply because they were bored. One who abused a woman wearing the niqab said she must be beautiful, or hiding something.

—————————————————————————

The study fails to mention the fact that most women in Egypt don’t wear proper hijab. They wear tight clothes, do their make-up and have half of their arms (and sometimes hair) also showing.

Hijab is an accessory for most girls in Egypt.

Egyptian authorities are useless. They don’t do anything. They give you a ticket when you stop your car somewhere for five minutes to wait for someone, and then they don’t give tickets to people who speed or those who don’t wear seat belts. The funny (not-so-funny) thing about the authorities in Egypt is that THEY are the ones that harass girls in the streets the most!

Anyway, just thought I’d add this to previous discussions. Wallahul musta’an.

Jul 19

During my first few days here in Egypt I went out with my cousin and her friend Lena* to this beautiful restaurant over-looking the beach. It was the first time I met Lena. She was sweet, kind and polite — she also happened to be a hijabi.

We went out and had a great time. I don’t know if i’ll see her again any time soon. But I was happy my cousin had such wonderful friends, mashaAllah.

Two days later, I’m with my cousin in the car stuck in traffic and she tells me “Did you know Lena took off her hijab?” I was like, “When? You mean a couple of years ago?”She replied, “No… I mean like yesterday. She’s been wearing it for seven years now.”

I was baffled. The thought of going out without my hijab after putting it on - especially for so long- is unthinkable to me. Not only because 1.  I do it for the sake of Allah, but 2. Because it would make me feel so exposed and naked without it.

I proceeded to tell my cousin that the intention probably wasn’t right from the beginning. After all, a lot of people in Egypt do it because of culture, not religion. But my cousin refuted that and told me that she was very sincere when she put it on and Lena told her that she wore it for the sake of Allah.

But WHY? What is the reason a person takes off their hijab if we know it is fard and we know that we are doing it to please Allah? What are the possible reasons that we might take off our hijabs?

Not everyone who takes off their hijab does so because they never had the right intention. And not everyone takes it off because they have low self-esteem or family pressure.

But still the question lingers… why? What is missing in our lives that we feel will be fulfilled with taking off our hijabs? One answer?

The love and attention of people, whether we know it consciously or subconsciously.

Allah ‘az wa jal says in surat Al-Baqarah:

“And of mankind are some who take (for worship) others besides Allah as rivals (to Allah). They love them as they love Allah. But those who believe, love Allah more (than anything else). If only, those who do wrong could see, when they will see the torment, that all power belongs to Allah and that Allah is Severe in punishment”

It’s seeking love from other than Allah. It’s obeying (worshiping) society and desires and leaving the worship of Allah ‘az wa jal.

And wallahi dear sisters, it is this seeking of filling the void in the heart in places other than with Allah that brings a person to the edge of a very steep cliff — a cliff that can lead to a person’s spiritual death.

What we truly miss in our hearts that needs fulfilling, is the love of Allah.

Dear sisters, whether we’ve never worn hijab at all or recently have decided to take it off, first, know that we do not judge anyone and what another’s heart contains. The hearts belong to Allah and no one can know what is in another person’s heart other than Allah. There are girls who wear hijab and commit shirk with Allah. And in the eyes of Allah they are nothing.

Second, know that Allah ‘az wa jal says in His noble book:

“Say: “O Ibadee (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah, verily Allah forgives all sins. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”

It does not matter what people think of us. If you feel, since you’ve taken off your hijab, people have judged you, then know that Allah ‘az wa jal is the one who will judge between people on the day of judgment. So what matters is what Allah ‘az wa jal thinks about you. And we should not seek love and attention from people before we seek it from Allah. Truly if you seek the love of Allah, then you will follow what Allah has sent with Muhammad Salallahu alayhi wa sallam and in turn you will gain the love of Allah and feel it in your hearts and be fully content.

As Allah ‘az wa jal says,

“Say (Muhammad salallahu alayhi wa sallam): ‘If you really love Allah, then follow me and Allah will love you. He will forgive your sins and Allah is the Oft-Forgiving, Most-Merciful.’”

Third, every girl who starts to wear hijab late in her life always goes through this stage in which she thinks about what it will be like to “never go out with her hair done again.” I know many sisters who set a time period of when they will start to wear hijab. They tell themselves, “I’m going to start wearing hijab FOR SURE, inshaAllah, when Ramadan starts.” (Hopefully Allah allows them to live that long.)

And we want to enjoy their time while we can before we actually commit to wear the hijab and never take it off.

Subhanallah, we know what you are going through, sisters. But know that while we think that we are “enjoying your time before commitment,” we will soon regret that time we spent before committing to hijab.

When you do something purely for the sake of Allah, then you regret all the times you didn’t do it.

It’s like a Muslim who starts to pray later in life, they soon regret all the times they didn’t pray when they were supposed to.

Allah ‘az wa jal clearly gives us an order in the Quran to wear our hijabs, and who has more right to be obeyed and fully submitted to other than the one who created us, nurishes and provides for us? No one.

Allah ‘az wa jal orders the believing women surat An-Nur to:

“…not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)…

We all say that we want to get closer to Allah. And it’s always about taking that next step. Everyone deep down knows what that next step is in their life, whether it’s actually doing something or even just refraining from one particular sin.

“Taking Off Hijab Syndrome” or “Didn’t Start Wearing Hijab Yet Syndrome” have cures. And that cure is found only with Allah. Seek help from Allah more than you would seek help from a doctor for a fatal disease. Because even doctors cannot cure diseases without the will of Allah.

Take the first step and Allah will help you take care of the rest inshaAllah. He will take care of all the people who have ever judged you, he will take care of your beauty and most of Allah he will take care of that void in your heart.

Wallahu alem. May Allah ‘az wa jal guide us to the path that leads to seeing His Face in Jannah, and may Allah make it easy for all our sisters. Ameen.

________________________________________________________________________________________

* Real names were not used.

Jul 16

She said she felt like dying when things didn’t go exactly how she wanted. I’ve known the sister for a long time now. She always seemed like she knew her bounds; like she knew Allah ‘az wa jal. But soon, all of what was inside her would come out and no one was expecting it.

It is the fuel for An-Nafs al-Ammarah bis-soo’ (the self that is inclined to evil), and it is the disease of An-Nafs al-Mutma’innah (the self with complete rest & satisfaction).

It is Al-Hawaa.

Fatima* had been wanting to marry this brother for a long time but she was scared of what her father would say. When the day came to tell her father and he refused, her hidden shirk had become apparent. She was committing shirk Al-mahabah.

She cried until she fell asleep from exhaustion. She wanted nothing more than to die. Fatima had grown obsessed over the months and no one knew about it. She kept saying that she wants nothing more than to marry the brother.

But what about Jannah? What about seeing Allah’s face?

Fatima had been living on the edge. Not in terms of lifestyle, but the edge of the fold of Islam.

Al-Hawaa, or desires, is not something that is disliked in and of itself. But it is the extremes that become despised. In fact, because it is rare to find someone that seeks to strike a balance in his desires,  Allah ‘az wa jal only mentions hawaa in the Quran when He dispraises it. And there are only very few instances in the sunnah when the term is used in a positive manner.

Sisters tend to over think and over analyze situations. It’s in our nature. And truly that is where some of the dangers of shirk al-mahabah lies. The more a person thinks about a desire, the more obsessed they become with it. And the more obsessed a person is, the more they want to break free from it but find themselves unable to do so.

Ibnul Qayyim describes this person: “He is like a bird that was deceived by a grain of wheat, neither was he able to get it, nor was he able to free himself from the trap he got caught in.”

Perhaps the most profound statement in all of Imam Ibnul Qayyim’s chapter on the dispraise of Al-Hawaa was the anaology he used when describing how man can be more astray than animals when it comes to desire, as Allah ‘az wa jal says in surat Al-Furqaan:

Have you (O Muhammad SAW) seen him who has taken as his ilah (god) his own desire? Would you then be a Wakeel (a disposer of his affairs or a watcher) over him?


Or do you think that most of them hear or understand? They are only like cattle; nay, they are even farther astray from the Path. (i.e. even worst than cattle).

To which imam Ibnul Qayyim said, “An animal takes a share of enjoyment in the taste of food, drinks, and sexual relations that is not attainable by man, and that it lives a comfortable life free from thought and worry. Hence it is driven to its slaughtering place preoccupied with its lusts due to the lack of knowledge about the consequences.” (Whereas man is given reason and intellect therefore man follows his desires to his doom, and is therefore even more astray than cattle.)

Hawaa linguistically means fell down. And the one who indulges in their desires in excess of what is desired by Allah, is only preparing himself to fall on his face.

I am given the opportunity to teach sisters, the youth, at our masjid. And one common thread is the reality of sisters and their obsessions. And the dangers of shirk al-mahabah are very real and very common. And although most people don’t realize it that they have elements of it. I realized that weakness in a person’s iman can be caused by this type of shirk, because the heart wants and yearns for other than Allah, thus causing a person to be unhappy and ultimately lowering their iman.

I’m sure many of you reading this know a case of someone who has gone crazy over another person, or “can’t live without” a certain food or drink to the extent that it not only makes their soul sick, but also their body.

Let every person look to his or her heart to see if this is the case with them. And know that it can all be solved with the help of Allah ‘az wa jal– by getting closer to him and distancing yourself enough from that which you love, whether that be food, drink or love.

Just a friendly reminder. Wallahu alem.

—————————————————————————

*real name not used.

For more on the topic of Al-Hawaa, please read “A chapter on The Dispraise of Al-Hawaa (Desire)” By Imam Ibnul Qayyim, prepared by sheik Saleh As-Saleh, rahmitullahi 3alayhom.

Jul 13

The following is a feature story I wrote last year. Until today, I continue to think about her story:

LSU custodian escapes bombs and lives to tell story

BATON ROUGE, La. - Oct. 18, 2007- To some, the rug in the living room is just for decoration. To others it’s there to keep their feet warm against the cold tiles. To Maryam Ghulam-Ali* it’s a constant reminder her terrifying past struggles.

She leaves for work everyday when her five kids come back from class. Some may see her inside the LSU engineering buildings cleaning after 3 p.m.

Most of those who see her would never be able to tell she lived what some would call a horror movie. Behind that big smile with dimpled cheeks, is a face of deep sadness for the past and fear for what the future holds.

Ghulam-Ali’s smile slowly faded as she began telling her story of her journey from war-torn Afghanistan to Baton Rouge, La.

She recalled when the Communist and the Taliban began fighting in the early 90s. “News started spreading that there was a group of so-called good Muslims that came to save us from the communist regime,” she said.

That is when the people of Afghanistan started to realize the same people they assumed would save them were the people they were now trying to escape from.

“There were bombs everywhere. A lot of people stealing things and the Taliban and Communist would kidnap girls and rape them,” she said.

“We always would hear how the girls would send letters home to tell their parents of their ware bouts, but the parents could never go to their daughters because of the danger involved in doing so.”

Ghulam-Ali’s husband always traveled on the road doing business. At the time when the bombing became more and more intense, she was nine months pregnant. Her husband tried to come back toward the end of her pregnancy term, but couldn’t because the roads were all blocked due to the fighting.

“One night around 7 p.m., I started to get intense stomach pains. I was so scared because I had no one with me. I only had my four young kids in a dark house,” she said.

She told her daughter, Malika Ghulam-Ali, who was only 5 years old at the time to run to the neighbor’s house and get help. Her neighbor came quickly knowing it could have something to do with her pregnancy.

“She was shocked and scared. She told me ‘Why now with all the bombs outside and the roads blocked without doctors?’ I was in so much pain at that time,” said Ghulam-Ali.

Luckily, her neighbor knew of a nurse that lived only two blocks away and hurried to go get her.

“She came with her supplies and a small lantern because of how dark it was. They put plastic under me and a blanket. The nurse gave me a shot, told me to walk for five minutes, and then I lied down and she pushed my stomach and the baby came out.”

Two days later, things got so bad for them in the city of Kabul, that a distant relative of her husband called and told them of their plan to escape to another state in Afghanistan.

Many of her family members had already escaped to Russia, India, Pakistan, and Iran.

“My husband was a business man. He used to drive trucks. So he was always away and we needed to try to escape,” she said.

The plan involved Ghulam-Ali and her four children at the time to walk to a bus station five miles away at the break of dawn to avoid anyone seeing them. It was there that they would meet with her husband’s distant relatives and escape to the state of Baghlam, Afghanistan.

“It was like walking from Wal-Mart on Siegen to the library on Blubonnet.”

Her children at that time were very young Malika ,5, her sister Tahmina ,4, their brother Mustafa ,2, and 3 days old Zahrafshan Ghulam-Ali accompanied their mom on the journey.

“I held Zahrafshan, while my three other kids walked. They were in pain from walking so much and it was extremely difficult but we had to leave. They walked slowly and cried a lot,” she said.

Two hours later they arrived at the bus station, bought their tickets and were on their way.

“We couldn’t take the main roads because they were blocked and too dangerous. So we escaped to Baghlam through the mountains. We went around the mountains until we got there,” She said.

Her family stayed in Baghlam for three years until they re-located to Pakistan because the fighting began to emerge there as well.

The month before they left for Pakistan, Maryam Ghulam-Ali, had her fifth child, Mugtabah.

“During that time, you had the Taliban telling everyone that for three days, no one should go outside or they will be killed. We couldn’t go get water, food or anything else.”

During those three days, it was the last time she heard from her husband. He was away on business and after that no one knew anything about him.

“We don’t know if he got killed or if he was kid-napped or what. We still don’t know if he is alive or not today,” she said.

With five children she had no time to deeply grieve. She just wanted to keep them safe. They escaped to Pakistan.

In Pakistan life was a little better. A local Mosque run by Iraqis took them in and found them an apartment to live in and found the kids jobs. For the next couple of months Malika, Tahmina, and Mustafa would make rugs for a living.

The kids would get trained and later became very skilled at making the rugs. “It was extremely hard work. I was only seven at that time. Malika was 11 years old and Tahmina was 10 years old,” said Mustafa.

“Because I was so young, our boss didn’t pay me. He only paid my sisters. That made me very angry and I went to complain but he hit me on my hands,” said Mustafa.

He went home and told his mother what happened and told her he wanted to quit. “I was so shocked that I went and took my other two kids home and they all quit their job,” Ghulam-Ali said. “We decided to make our own rug business and sell them, and that worked out.”

She pointed to the rugs they made on her living room floor. One was made of soft wool with a lot of calm cream and green colors, while the other was equally exquisite in its beauty.

“I cried a lot during that time because my kids had to work and couldn’t go to school. They also had to take off their shoes and use it as a pillow to sleep on,” she said.

“I don’t cry often, but when I remember some of the things we went through, I have to start crying,” added Mustafa.

It was in Pakistan, she was informed of the UN office. She went there seeking help. She had to take a series of interviews, including health exams for her and her children. At the end of the process they gave her tickets and passports to America.

“I cried so much that day. My kids didn’t know where we were going. And none of us knew English. But I was happy,” she said.

In August 2001 Ghulam-Ali and her five children arrived in Baton Rouge, La. Immigration officers moved her to a small apt. on Brightside Drive with only three spoons, one pillow, and a couch that wreaked so badly it make her children sick. The local mosque on West Chimes Street then stepped in and provided them with everything they needed.

Today, Ghulam-Ali’s five children are in school; the oldest two in college on scholarships, one in high school, and two in middle school. Three of her children have jobs on the side.

The family has an apartment fully furnished with beds for everyone to sleep on and they always come home to food on the table.

Ghulam-Ali will take her citizenship test for the second time this winter after failing the first time due to not knowing what it meant to have the right to bare arms. “I was confused I thought they were talking about bears -like the animal- and their arms,” she said laughingly.

*Not her real last name, so for the purpose of the article I gave her husband’s last name. This article is one year old.

Jun 11

Bismillah,

I thought for a while before I decided to write this post as this topic goes way out of my comfort zone. I stumbled upon an article written in the International Herald Tribune, which quite frankly shocked me, disgusted me and confused me all at the same time. So here’s the article, then I’ll give my comments below that:

**If you like the post, go ahead and Stumble it**

——————————————–

For Muslim women in Europe, a medical road back to virginity

 

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

PARIS: The surgery in the private clinic off the Champs-Élysées involved one semicircular cut, 10 self-dissolving stitches and a discounted fee of $2,900.

But for the patient, a 23-year-old French student of Moroccan descent from Montpellier, the 30-minute procedure represented the key to a new life: the illusion of virginity.

Like an increasing number of other Muslim women in Europe, she had a “hymenoplasty,” a restoration of her hymen, the thin vaginal membrane that normally breaks during the first act of intercourse.

“In my culture, not to be a virgin is to be dirt,” said the student, perched on a hospital bed as she awaited surgery Thursday. “Right now, virginity is more important to me than life.”

As Europe’s Muslim population grows, many young Muslim women find themselves caught between the freedoms thatdoctor.jpg European society affords and the deep-rooted traditions of their parents’ and grandparents’ generations.

Gynecologists report that in the past few years, more Muslim women are asking for certificates of virginity before marriage.

That trend in turn has created a demand among cosmetic surgeons for hymen replacements, which, if done properly, they say, will not be detected and will produce tell-tale vaginal bleeding on the wedding night. The service is widely advertised on the Internet; there are medical tourism packages to countries like Tunisia where the procedure is less expensive.

“If you’re a Muslim woman growing up in more open societies in Europe, you can easily end up having sex before marriage,” said Hicham Mouallem, a doctor in London who performs the surgery. “So if you’re looking to marry a Muslim and don’t want to have problems, you’ll try to recapture your virginity.”

There are no reliable statistics on how many women undergo the procedure because it is mostly done in private clinics and in most cases is not covered by tax-financed insurance plans.

But the subject of hymen repair is becoming so talked about that it has become the subject of a film comedy that opens in Italy this week. “Women’s Hearts,” as its title is translated in English, tells the story of a Moroccan-born woman living in Italy who takes a road trip to Casablanca for the operation.

“We realized that what we thought was a sporadic practice was actually pretty common,” said Davide Sordella, the director. “These women can live in Italy, adopt our mentality and wear jeans. But in the moments that matter, they don’t always have the strength to go against their culture.”

The issue has been particularly charged in France, where there has been a renewed and fierce debate about a prejudice that was supposed to have been buried with the country’s sexual revolution 40 years ago: the importance of a woman’s virginity.

The furor followed the revelation two weeks ago that a court in the northern city of Lille had annulled the 2006 marriage of two French Muslims after the groom discovered his bride was not the virgin she had claimed to be.

The domestic saga has gripped the nation. The bridegroom, an unidentified engineer in his 30s, left the nuptial bed and announced to the still-partying wedding guests that his bride had lied about her past. She was delivered that night to her parents’ doorstep.

The next day, he asked a lawyer to annul the marriage. The bride, then a nursing student in her 20s, confessed the truth to the court and agreed to an annulment.

In its ruling, there was no mention of religion. Rather, it cited breach of contract, concluding that he had married her after “she was presented to him as single and chaste.”

In secular, republican France, the case touches on several sensitive subjects: the intrusion of religion into daily life, the grounds for dissolution of a marriage and the equality of the sexes.

There were calls in Parliament this week for the resignation of Rachida Dati, the minister of justice, after she upheld the ruling. Dati, who is a Muslim, backed down and ordered an appeal.

Some feminists, lawyers and doctors warned that the court’s acceptance of the centrality of virginity in marriage would encourage more French women from Arab and African Muslim backgrounds to have their hymens rebuilt. But there is much debate over whether the procedure is an act of liberation or repression.

“The judgment was a betrayal of France’s Muslim women,” said Elizabeth Badinter, a feminist writer. “It sends these women a message of despair by saying that virginity is important in the eyes of the law. More women are going to say to themselves: ‘My God, I’m not going to take that risk. I’ll recreate my virginity.”‘

The plight of the rejected bride persuaded the Montpellier student to go ahead with the surgery.

She insisted that she had never had intercourse and said that she had discovered her hymen was torn only when she tried to obtain a certificate of virginity to present to her boyfriend and his family.

She said she had bled after an accident on a horse when she was 10.

The trauma of realizing that she could not prove her virginity was so intense, she said, that she quietly took out a loan to pay for the procedure.

“All of a sudden, virginity is important in France,” she said. “I realized that I could be seen like that woman everyone is talking about on television.”

Surgeons who perform the procedure said they were empowering their patients by giving them a viable future and preventing them from being abused - or even killed - by their fathers or brothers.

“Who am I to judge?” asked Marc Abecassis, the plastic surgeon who restored the Montpellier student’s hymen. “I have colleagues in the United States whose patients do this as a Valentine’s present to their husbands. What I do is different. This is not for amusement. My patients don’t have a choice if they want to find serenity - and husbands.”

A specialist in what he calls “intimate” surgery, including penile enhancement, Abecassis says he performs two to four hymen restorations a week.

The French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians opposes the hymen procedure on moral, cultural and health grounds.

“We had a revolution in France to win equality; we had a sexual revolution in 1968 when women fought for contraception and abortion,” said Jacques Lansac, the association’s president. “Attaching so much importance to the hymen is regression, submission to the intolerance of the past.”

But the stories of the women who have had the surgery capture the complexity and raw emotion behind their decision.

One 32-year-old Macedonian-born Muslim said that she had chosen the surgery to avoid being punished by her father after her relationship with her boyfriend of eight years ended.

“I was afraid that my father would take me to a doctor and see whether I was still a virgin,” said the woman, who owns a small business and lives on her own in Frankfurt. “He told me, ‘I will forgive everything, but not if you have thrown dirt on my honor.’ I wasn’t afraid he would kill me, but I was sure he would have beaten me.”

In other cases, the woman and her partner together decide on the surgery. A 26-year-old French woman of Moroccan descent said she lost her virginity four years ago when she fell in love with the man she was now planning to marry. She and her fiancé decided to share the cost of her $3,400 hymen replacement surgery in Paris.

His extended family in Morocco is very conservative, she said, and required that a gynecologist - and family friend - in Morocco examine her for proof of virginity before their wedding.

“It doesn’t matter for my fiancé that I am not a virgin, but it would pose a huge problem for his family,” she said. “They know that you can pour blood on the sheets on the wedding night, so I have to have better proof.”

Meanwhile, the lives of the young French couple whose marriage was annulled are on hold. The Justice Ministry has asked the Lille prosecutor for an appeal, arguing that the court decision “provoked a heated social debate” that “touched all citizens of our country and especially women.” At the Islamic Center of Roubaix, the suburb of Lille where the marriage took place, there is sympathy for the woman.

“The man is the biggest of all the donkeys,” said Abdelkibir Errami, the center’s vice president. “Even if the woman was no longer a virgin, he had no right to expose her honor. This is not what Islam teaches. It teaches forgiveness.”

Katrin Bennhold contributed reporting from Paris and Elisabetta Povoledo contributed from Rome.

———————————–

When I first read this article, I was pretty disgusted. First, I found it interesting from a journalistic perspective the authors didn’t even bother to go into detail of what is the Islamic stance on such issues — whether it be on the procedure itself or even just the Islamic view of illegal sexual intercourse. It was all this talk about feminism and how some Europeans think that it’s oppressive to Muslim women because they are somehow “backward” in thinking that their virginity is important. The whole article was written in respect of culture; not religion.

I’m not even sure how to feel about this if the woman is truly repentant and wants to hide her sin from everyone — at least she repented before Allah. Likewise, I can understand doing a procedure like this in cases of rape.

And for anyone who read the article and is wondering the Islamic view on the issue go ahead and read the detailed fatwah on Islam QA:

http://islamqa.com/en/ref/844

Another part of this article that shocked me is this notion of having a “certificate of virginity” — seriously? Like are you really serious? That’s when you know society is corrupt, when your word and assuming the best of the girl is no longer acceptable. That a girl has to go to the doctor before the marriage is done and get this “certificate.” I don’t know about the girl but I think I’d be pretty offended if someone told me I have to go to the doctor and give the family proof.

And to the guy’s family, if you really are unsure about the girl then:

1. You should assume the best

2. If her character gives you doubts, isn’t that a SIGN?

Everything about this article shocked me, from the “Valentines Day gift” to the MAN who performs this surgery three or four times a week.

WAllahul musta’an. This is scary to think that this is the state of Muslims today. May Allah protect us from his wrath. Ameen.

Wallahu alem.

 

May 9

I just saw this news article, which just made me say, “Subhanallah!” We tend think about earthquakes, tornadoes, cyclones and tsunamis when referring to natural disasters — but now you can add “Sinkholes” to that list. And apparently there is a major one in Texas.

I’ve never heard of sinkhole before today. News.aol.com reported sinkholes can sometimes be caused by “The collapse of an old salt dome where oil brine and natural gas are stored underground.”

It’s apprently expanding and takes about 2 weeks to fully stabilize. It just shows another ayah of the might and power of Allah! One thought always comes to my mind when thinking about these natural disasters: they Day of Judgment; how scary it actually is when you see these things. WAllahul musta’an.

Alhamdulillah, so far there have been no reports of injuries. Here are some pictures for your viewing: (I’m going to be “un-journalistic” and not put captions nor credits for these photos.. if you want to see the source to go yahoo news and aol news.. nor will I edit this post, I’m tired.)

sinkhole1.jpg

sinkhole2.jpg

sinkhole3.jpg

this thing is 900 feet wide and about 200 feet DEEP

sinkhole4.jpg

sinkhole5.jpg

sinkhole6.jpg

 

Here’s an article about it:

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080509/ap_on_re_us/texas_sinkhole;_ylt=AtE7YKFaZ9_wabM6dU10b1BsaMYA
La qowwita illa billah.

« Previous Entries


Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Technorati Favorites!