Open Letter to Rod Dreher: From One Columnist to Another

Mr. Dreher, 325752626_69392aa6b1.jpg

Your latest article on beliefnet.com has recently come to my attention — partially because of the subject matter being about me and my work with The Daily Reveille.

I’ve done a little bit of research about you and your past and have discovered that you are currently a columnist for the Dallas Morning News, are a contributor to the National Review and The American Conservative. It also appears that you were previously a columnist for The New York Post and have authored a book titled, “Crunchy Cons.”

However, regardless of your “credentials,” I am not impressed. While it does seems that you are a journalist by definition, you failed to do the most fundamental and obvious thing any journalist should do before writing an article: research. You’ve been an opinion columnist longer than I have. So it seems rather odd to me that you would neither do your research nor ask me for an interview before assuming certain things.

In your article, “Dhimmitude on the Bayou” you wrote:

“Favog discovers, to his chagrin, that our alma mater in journalism, the LSU Daily Reveille, allowed itself to be mau-mau’d by a Muslim Student into giving her a column, which she used to proselytize for Islam.”

Mr. Dreher, it seems as though you did not take the time to even look through or read any of my columns before rushing to judgment.

You later said, “Now, just imagine a state college newspaper giving a column to a fundamentalist Christian who uses it solely for the purpose of evangelization. Wouldn’t happen. Shouldn’t happen. But anything can be justified in the name of diversity. Ms. Elmasraya may be a pushy activist with a one-track mind, and a mediocre, jargon-dependent writer to boot, but the lady obviously knows a thing or two about how American newsrooms work. I predict she’ll go far.”

evangelical-loons-751246.jpgI challenge you to find any instances in any of my columns i’ve written in the past 1.5 years in which I blatantly call people to accept Islam. If someone accepted Islam as a result of reading my columns and seeing the truth nature of Islam, than this is by the Will of Allah alone and I’m very happy that I could help someone see the true nature of a true religion. And yes, this has happened before but I still challenge you to find an instance of what you call, “Evangelization.”

So again, for a journalist it’s surprising to see that you did little-to-no research on my past columns before you decided to dish out your “George-Bushy” words.

You claim that I somehow admitted my columns were for proselytizing Islam in my “Farewell Daily Reveille” post - which again, has no basis. I told a story of how I was hired. And in order to understand my post you need to understand a concept called “Divine Decree” or Qadr. And that is to say that Allah (or God) had everything that we will do in our lives already written before we were even born and that everything that happens in the world is by His will. It was by the divine decree of Allah that I was at the right place and the right time which led me to get my job. Much like it is by the Qadr of Allah that we wake up every morning.

I also take offense at the notion you have made by implying The Daily Reveille felt threatened or pressured into hireing me. If that were the case, then why would they re-hire me for two more semesters in which about 100 other people were competing for that one spot every semester? I did have to re-apply and go through the interview process every semester with different editors and different managers each time — just so you know. And tell me Mr. Dreher, how can this be when I had no idea they were accepting applications at the time and the editor himself was the one who suggested I apply? Hmm…

You also said, “Now, just imagine a state college newspaper giving a column to a fundamentalist Christian who uses it solely for the purpose of evangelization. Wouldn’t happen. Shouldn’t happen.”

It did happen. Again, this shows your lack of research because if you did any at all the name “Emily Byers” would come to mind. Byers is a friend and ex-Coworker of mine. She, too, was a columnist for The Daily Reveille who — more often than not — would talk about Catholicism. So nice try.

lucbanner.jpg

I’d like to thank you for being an example to the Muslims (and to the rest of the world) the very problem with the mass media today. People are quick to write and speak publicly without doing any investigations or without knowing anything at all about the topic they talk about.

Your use of the words “Dhimmi,” “Evangelical” and “Proselytize” are poor attempts of persuasion, to say the least. And I think most of your readers caught on to that based on the comments they left you on your site. But to reiterate, I thank you for being a prime example for my readers as to why they should NOT trust everything a journalist and someone with so-called “credentials” spews out at them.

Perhaps the problem, Mr. Dreher, is not that The Daily Reveille hired me to write about Islam, but perhaps you, as a strong conservative, are merely threatened by the spread of the true nature of Islam. For even the idol-worshipers during the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) used to attack him not because of him as a person, but because it was Islam and truth that they hated.

And Allah knows best.

Sincerely,

Shirien

Stumble it!

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to Technorati Favorites!

5 Responses

  1. MR Says:

    Mr. Rod Dreher just wants to get hits and ratings. It’s not about the truth. It’s about money and popularity. He doesn’t care about the truth.

    This is the reality of many journalists today.

  2. HK Says:

    It seems as if people today have a hard time distinguishing between correcting misconceptions and proselytizing. Maybe, to them, it’s a fine line. But obviously if you’re going to bring in some kind of information your readers are unfamiliar with (if one were to assume little knowledge of Islam of a largely non-Muslim population, in this case), it has to be explained in that context! This is how I have seen Islam being used in your articles: for the purpose of correcting the distorted image that others are trying to paint it as. And why not when what started it all was someone’s hateful piece in the same paper trashing Islam? It warms my heart that a journalist of his caliber has to denounce the kind writing you have done and yet say nothing of the hate others wish to spread. Kudos.

  3. Alima Says:

    Amazing open letter…subhanAllah Qadr indeed Mr Dreher wrote the most appropriate article at the most appropraite time to show us another lesson through his actions, regarding the mass media.

    It’s about money and popularity, sadly it is indeed.

  4. Ahmed Eid Says:

    Ha…

    Mr. Dreher, even I know better than that…

    Its clear to me that you used your article to get hits…

    tisk tisk tisk

  5. shirien Says:

    I think that’s one thing I really hated about the News media, they print and broadcast things just for controversy and getting more readers/viewers.

    I noticed that so much when we’d have our meetings every week. Everyone would have to come with ideas and the more controversial it was the more likely that was the idea they were told to go with.

    it’s pretty sad and that’s exactly why no REAL information is put out there. and then the moment someone says pure facts about Islam, people complain. Sorry it’s not jerry springer material! There was this one guy who constantly told me to write about pop culture “paris hilton, music, etc” I’m like subhanallah, they leave that which is beneficial and then stick to the trash that’s out there like it’s religion?

    HK, you’re so right. It’s not even a fine line yet they make it out to be. it’s either obvious with evangelism or just isnt evangelism.

    And to Mr. Dreher who says that it doesnt happen and shouldnt happen… what about people like “Pat Robertson?” He claims to give you “news.” I don’t see christians merely as upset about him as they are with hiring a muslim to write about islam (without evangelizing) tell me.. is this not a double standard?

    different mediums of information.. same double standard.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.